Draft: Corrige les paramètres dans les requête post-harmonisation

tests/Simulation_engine/test_simulate_pop_from_reform.py

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ def test_calcule_maillage_intervalle():
 
     assert_frame_equal(revenus_bruts, expected, check_dtype=False)
 
-
+# openfisca-france < v 115.0.0
 dictreform = {
     "impot_revenu": {
         "bareme": {
@@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ dictreform = {
     }
 }
 
-
 # Bon je veux :  calculer l'inverse de quelques revenu_imposable : 10000, 20000, 30000
 # Check que le salaire_imposable est bien le même à l'arrivée qu'au début
 
@@ -256,15 +255,18 @@ def requested_simulations():
 def test_sim_pop_dict_content(reform, requested_simulations):
     simulation_reform = simulation(PERIOD, DUMMY_DATA, reform)
     comp_result = compare(PERIOD, {"apres": simulation_reform})
+
     assert "total" in comp_result
     assert "deciles" in comp_result
     assert "frontieres_deciles" in comp_result
     assert len(comp_result["frontieres_deciles"]) == len(comp_result["deciles"])
     assert "foyers_fiscaux_touches" in comp_result
-    # assert len(comp_result["deciles"])==10 Removed cause with the cas type description
+
+
     for key in requested_simulations:
         assert key in comp_result["total"]
         assert key in comp_result["deciles"][0]
+    
     for index_key_1 in range(len(requested_simulations)):
         for index_key_2 in range(index_key_1 + 1, len(requested_simulations)):
             key = (
@@ -362,3 +364,80 @@ def test_sim_custom_cas_types_dict_content_ok(requested_simulations):
         assert key in comp_result["total"]
         assert key in comp_result["res_brut"]
         assert len(comp_result["res_brut"][key]) == len(dict_cas)
+
+
+# OPENFISCA-FRANCE v115+
+
+# v115 = harmonisation IR 
+# https://github.com/openfisca/openfisca-france/pull/1823
+dictreform_openfisca_france_v115_plus = {
+    "impot_revenu": {
+        "calcul_impot_revenu": {
+            "plaf_qf": {
+                "abat_dom": {
+                    "taux_GuadMarReu": 0.3,
+                    "plaf_GuadMarReu": 2450,
+                    "taux_GuyMay": 0.4,
+                    "plaf_GuyMay": 4050,
+                },
+                "general": 1551,  # était 'maries_ou_pacses'
+                "celib_enf": 3660,
+                "celib": 927,
+                "reduc_postplafond": 1547,
+                "reduc_postplafond_veuf": 1728,
+                "reduction_ss_condition_revenus": {
+                    "seuil_maj_enf": 3797,
+                    "seuil1": 18985,
+                    "seuil2": 21037,
+                    "taux": 0.20,
+                },
+            },
+            "decote": {"seuil_celib": 1196, "seuil_couple": 1970, "taux": 0.75}
+        },
+        "bareme_ir_depuis_1945": {
+            "bareme": {
+                "seuils": [0, 9964, 27159, 73779, 156244],
+                "taux": [0, 0.14, 0.30, 0.41, 0.45],
+            },
+        },   
+    }
+}
+
+@fixture
+def reform_openfisca_france_v115_plus():
+    return IncomeTaxReform(TBS, dictreform_openfisca_france_v115_plus, PERIOD)
+
+
+def test_sim_pop_v115_dict_content(reform_openfisca_france_v115_plus, requested_simulations):
+    simulation_reform = simulation(PERIOD, DUMMY_DATA, reform_openfisca_france_v115_plus)
+    comp_result = compare(PERIOD, {"apres": simulation_reform})
+
+    assert "total" in comp_result
+    assert "deciles" in comp_result
+    assert "frontieres_deciles" in comp_result
+    assert len(comp_result["frontieres_deciles"]) == len(comp_result["deciles"])
+    assert "foyers_fiscaux_touches" in comp_result
+    # assert len(comp_result["deciles"])==10 Removed cause with the cas type description
+    for key in requested_simulations:
+        assert key in comp_result["total"]
+        assert key in comp_result["deciles"][0]
+    for index_key_1 in range(len(requested_simulations)):
+        for index_key_2 in range(index_key_1 + 1, len(requested_simulations)):
+            key = (
+                requested_simulations[index_key_1]
+                + "_to_"
+                + requested_simulations[index_key_2]
+            )
+            # list of keys checked can be for example ["avant_to_apres", "avant_to_plf", "plf_to_apres"]
+            assert key in comp_result["foyers_fiscaux_touches"]
+            for type_touche, nb_people in comp_result["foyers_fiscaux_touches"][
+                key
+            ].items():
+                assert type_touche in [
+                    "gagnant",
+                    "neutre",
+                    "perdant",
+                    "perdant_zero",
+                    "neutre_zero",
+                ]
+                assert isinstance(nb_people, int)